CHACHAVALPONGPUN, Pavin(チャチャワーンポンパン・パヴィン)

staff_matsubayashi

Division:Division of Economic and Political Dynamics

Position:Associate Professor

Area

E-Mail:pavin [at] cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp

WEB


ku_db_link

Research Interests:

  1. Domestic politics and international relations of Thailand
  2. Politics of mainland Southeast Asia and interstate relations
  3. Regional integration and ASEAN

Research Overview:

    In the first project, I will be looking at key institutions in Thailand and how they will shape a new political order particularly after the much revered King Bhumobil Adulyadej passes from the scene, particularly the monarchy and the military. I will also take into account the importance of the emerging red shirt movement and the impact on democratisation in Thailand. In the second project, I will be looking at political reforms in Myanmar, the role of the military in the civilianised era and how the government will reconcile with some ethnic insurgents. TOPIC 1 What did the 2006 military coup show us? It demonstrated that the crux of the Thai crisis is far more serious and much wider in scope than had previously been thought. The monarchy is surely not a victim in the protracted conflict, but the root cause and continuing factor that has eroded Thai politics. The coup set in motion more prejudicial uses of the lèse-majesté law, and in the process, has led to more political prisoners. It has also shredded the military into several segments, turning generals into desperate royalists who continue to live off the monarchy in order to survive. Issues of violence in the Thai south and the Thai-Cambodian dispute became greatly intensified in the age of militarized politics. The coup also produced unique colour-coded politics and created crises of legitimacy. TOPIC 2 It is fair to say that the Thai-Cambodian relationship has been shaped and reshaped by domestic factors both in Thailand and Cambodia. Issues in bilateral relations were, unfortunately, politicized, including the overlapping territorial claims in the areas surrounding the Preah Vihear temple, or known in Thai as Phra Wihan. The Thai crisis has led to a series of armed clashes between the two countries’ armies, from 2008 to 2011. The use of military force to settle a dispute became a preferred measure on the part of the two countries. This threatened not only bilateral relations between Cambodia and Thailand but regional peace and stability. The tension caused primarily by the fallout from Thai domestic political infighting prompted widespread criticism and stirred up a sense of nationalism among the Cambodians and the Thais. Moreover, the border dispute has re-opened the question of ownership of Temple of Preah Vihear which compelled Cambodia to call on the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to reinterpret the ruling of 1962. What did the 2006 military coup show us? It demonstrated that the crux of the Thai crisis is far more serious and much wider in scope than had previously been thought. The monarchy is surely not a victim in the protracted conflict, but the root cause and continuing factor that has eroded Thai politics. The coup set in motion more prejudicial uses of the lèse-majesté law, and in the process, has led to more political prisoners. It has also shredded the military into several segments, turning generals into desperate royalists who continue to live off the monarchy in order to survive. Issues of violence in the Thai south and the Thai-Cambodian dispute became greatly intensified in the age of militarized politics. The coup also produced unique colour-coded politics and created crises of legitimacy. TOPIC II It is fair to say that the Thai-Cambodian relationship has been shaped and reshaped by domestic factors both in Thailand and Cambodia. Issues in bilateral relations were, unfortunately, politicized, including the overlapping territorial claims in the areas surrounding the Preah Vihear temple, or known in Thai as Phra Wihan. The Thai crisis has led to a series of armed clashes between the two countries’ armies, from 2008 to 2011. The use of military force to settle a dispute became a preferred measure on the part of the two countries. This threatened not only bilateral relations between Cambodia and Thailand but regional peace and stability. The tension caused primarily by the fallout from Thai domestic political infighting prompted widespread criticism and stirred up a sense of nationalism among the Cambodians and the Thais. Moreover, the border dispute has re-opened the question of ownership of Temple of Preah Vihear which compelled Cambodia to call on the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to reinterpret the ruling of 1962.

Research Publications:

Author Name Title Date
Language
Pavin Chachavalpongpun, co-editor Bangkok, May 2010: Perspectives on a Divided Thailand 2012
English
ISEAS
Pavin Chachavalpongpun Preah Vihear: A Guide to the Thai-Cambodian Conflict and Its Solutions 2012
English
ISEAS
Pavin Chachavalpongpun, editor Good Coup Gone Bad: Thailand’s Political Developments since Thaksin’s Downfall 2012
English
ISEAS

ku_db_link

Academic Articles:

Author Name Title Date
Pavin Chachavalpongpun The Vexing Strategic Tug-of-War over Naypyidaw: ASEAN’s View of the Sino-Burmese Ties 2012
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
Pavin Chachavalpongpun Embittered History: Unending Conflicts in Thai-Cambodian Relations 2012
Asian Affairs
Pavin Chachavalpongpun The Necessity of Enemies in Thailand’s Troubled Politics 2012
Asian Survey

ku_db_link

Research Project :

Project Name
[Grant Organization]
Project Leader Period
ミャンマー「開国」と民主化への障害要因に関する総合的研究
基盤研究(B)
CHACHAVALPONGPUN, Pavin 2013 - 2016
Research Summary
 世界が注視する2010年11月総選挙と2011年3月の「文民」政権誕生以来のミャンマーの民主化に向けた一連の動きや改革について、一般に流布している根拠の乏しい楽観論を排し、政治学、経済学、文化人類学を含む学際的研究組織の構築を通じて、冷静で客観的かつ総合的な分析を行い、今後ミャンマーが民主化や改革をさらに進めるに当たって障害となり得る、内的な諸要因について深い理解に達します。またミャンマーの民主 [ Read More ]

pagetop