{"id":8374,"date":"2019-11-01T15:12:36","date_gmt":"2019-11-01T06:12:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/ipcr\/?p=8374"},"modified":"2020-02-25T21:48:36","modified_gmt":"2020-02-25T12:48:36","slug":"fy2019iv-9iga","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/ipcr\/en\/fy2019iv-9iga\/","title":{"rendered":"IV-9. “Comparative Study on Election Monitoring and Political Regime in Southeast Asia” (R1 FY2019)"},"content":{"rendered":"
This project researches the practices and political and social influences of election monitoring in six countries (Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia, and Myanmar). By comparing six case studies, this project classifies the types of election monitoring and elucidates why and how these types emerge.<\/p>\n
The collaboration of members who conduct quantitative and qualitative research is another purpose of this research project.<\/p>\n
This project researches the practices and political and social influences of election monitoring in six countries (Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia, and Myanmar). By comparing six case studies, this project classifies the types of election monitoring and elucidates why and how these types emerge.<\/p>\n
Although there is plenty of research on election monitoring, including research that focuses on the practices and volunteers, previous research does not focus on the influence and diversity of election monitoring.<\/p>\n
This research will clarify the influence and diversity of election monitoring, which previous studies have not focused on. By comparing six case studies and the international collaborations of election monitoring, this research can be expected to gain theoretical implications beyond the Southeast Asian context.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n