{"id":8380,"date":"2019-11-01T15:29:46","date_gmt":"2019-11-01T06:29:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/ipcr\/?p=8380"},"modified":"2020-02-29T12:03:04","modified_gmt":"2020-02-29T03:03:04","slug":"fy2019iv-11ikeda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/ipcr\/en\/fy2019iv-11ikeda\/","title":{"rendered":"IV-11. “Buddhists and Muslims in Theravada Societies in Mainland Southeast Asia: Historical and Anthropological Studies” (R1 FY2019)"},"content":{"rendered":"
Contrary to the image in various media of a recent and \u201cproblematic\u201d spread of Islam, Muslims have been a part of Theravada Buddhist societies in mainland Southeast Asia since their arrival in the late first millennium. This arrival is mainly a result of historical communications and migrations from the neighboring three Islamic areas of maritime Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, and Southwest China. However, recent essentialist discourses such as \u201cBuddhists and Muslims are as incompatible as oil and water\u201d are becoming dominant and easily turn to historical essentialism to fortify hostility. This trend reveals an absence of basic understanding of the historical interactions between Buddhists and Muslims. This research project aims to present an overall picture of the historical and social relationships between the Buddhists and Muslims in Theravada societies in mainland Southeast Asia.<\/p>\n
Muslims from the Indian subcontinent, maritime Southeast Asia, and China have visited, migrated amid, and been integrated into Theravada societies in mainland Southeast Asia for many centuries. As a whole, coexistence has been the predominant reality. Despite journalistic attention on recent eye-catching cases, such as that of the Malay Patani in southern Thailand and the Rohingya in western Myanmar, Muslim communities in general have been living without major problems under or in the vicinities of Theravada kingships, colonial regimes, and subsequent nation-states in the region.<\/p>\n
The goal of our research project is to provide an overall historical perspective and picture of Buddhist and Muslim relations in mainland Southeast Asia. It will combine 1) a historical perspective to grasp the tendencies to better understand the character and evolution of Buddhist-Muslim relationships during the past few centuries with 2) an anthropological approach to observe different phases of contact, acceptance, and conflict between the communities. During the two years of the IPCR, we will collect basic bibliographies, statistics, and information on Muslim communities scattered in the region, and then construct a basic hypothesis regarding the relationships and interactions between Muslim and Buddhist communities. This will lay the groundwork for a substantial research project fully financed by the KAKENHI (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research) within two years, and intends to organize research of several significant cases in Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam focusing on the ecological, political, economic, and social aspects of the contacts, conflicts, interactions, and integrations of each case. The subjects of our field research are Burmese, Bengals, Rohingyas, Indians, and Chinese in Myanmar, Malays and Chinese in Thailand, Chams and others in Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam, and other Muslim minorities.<\/p>\n
The significance of our research project lies in establishing a standard historical and social understanding of positions of Muslim peoples in mainland Southeast Asia. First, it aims to provide a general picture of the historical relations between Buddhists and Muslims. This includes the process of cognitive transformations of the parties involved, who may not in the first place recognize themselves as belonging to religious categories such as Buddhist or Muslim. Secondly, the hidden realities of ordinary co-existences, which are currently overshadowed by sensationalist coverage of violent incidents in major media, will be re-evaluated in terms of the mechanisms of co-existence and conflict.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n