{"id":2398,"date":"2018-03-29T16:58:15","date_gmt":"2018-03-29T07:58:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/?page_id=2398"},"modified":"2019-12-25T15:40:59","modified_gmt":"2019-12-25T06:40:59","slug":"toyama-ayako","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/about\/staff-page\/toyama-ayako\/","title":{"rendered":"TOYAMA Ayako"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
<\/i><\/strong> a.toyama <\/i> cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp<\/p>\n \n <\/div>\n Political and Economic Coexistence\u30fbAffiliated Lecturer<\/p>\n Thai Politics, Comparative Politics<\/p>\n \u30fbPolitics of anti-corruption in emerging countries <\/p>\n \n Since the 1990s international organizations have promoted corruption control. However, looking at the current state of emerging countries, in fact, corruption crackdown has become a political tool. In this research, we will emphasize the difference between the forms of corruption regulatory agencies idealized by international organizations and the corruption regulatory agencies in emerging countries that appeared in reality. Academically, there is significance in presenting doubt to conventional research that finds positive correlation between corruption control and democratization. Moreover, we can provide new knowledge to analyze the politics of emerging countries against the real world. We are planning to publish editing, now it is working.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n The number of scenes where judicial plays a political role in emerging and developed countries has been increasing. I am aiming to provide a new viewpoint of Thailand as to why this phenomenon has happend, judicial political neutrality can be maintained or not, what kind of relationship it is with democracy. I plan to publish a book and is currently writing.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n In Japan, the interest in monarchy has been rising with the succession of the Emperor. In this research, we organized a team with Asian and Middle Eastern researchers, and on the relationship between the monarchs of each country (mainly the constitutional monarchy) and politics Comparative study will be conducted. Application for research grant, waiting for results.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\nResearch Departments\u30fbPosition<\/h2>\n
Area<\/h2>\n
Research Interests \/ Keywords<\/h2>\n
\n\u30fbDemocratization of Thailand and Judicialization of Politics
\n\u30fbInternational comparison of constitutional monarchy\n<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nOverview<\/h3>\n
<\/p>\n
\n Politics of anti-corruption in emerging countries<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n \n Democratization of Thailand and Judicialization of Politics<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n \n International comparison of constitutional monarchy<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n Research funds<\/h3>\n
<\/p>\n
\n Type<\/th>\n Theme<\/th>\n Period<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n \n Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)<\/td>\n \u65b0\u8208\u56fd\u306b\u304a\u3051\u308b\u6c5a\u8077\u53d6\u7de0\u306e\u653f\u6cbb\u5b66<\/a><\/td>\n 2018 \u2013 2020<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)<\/td>\n Politics of Accountability in Southeast Asia<\/a><\/td>\n 2017 \u2013 2019<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)<\/td>\n The Rising of Counter-elite and Regime Change in Southeast Asia<\/a><\/td>\n 2015 \u2013 2017<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n