{"id":5611,"date":"2019-04-25T11:03:04","date_gmt":"2019-04-25T02:03:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/?p=5611"},"modified":"2019-04-15T11:09:53","modified_gmt":"2019-04-15T02:09:53","slug":"20190425","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/2019\/04\/20190425\/","title":{"rendered":"CSEAS Colloquium with Dr. Philip Hirsch"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"Transboundary environmental governance of the Mekong: rethinking borders and rescaling the commons<\/strong><\/p>\n

by Philip Hirsch<\/p>\n

Date<\/strong>: April 25, 2019, Thursday 13:30 to 14:30
\nVenue<\/strong>: Middle-sized Meeting Room, Inamori Foundation Building<\/p>\n

Abstract<\/strong>:
\nTransboundary environmental governance in Southeast Asia is normally conceived in terms of shared resources and environmental impacts that transcend national borders. In the case of the Mekong, \u201cfugitive resources\u201d of water, fish and sediment tend to dominate discussion.
\nSimilarly, assumed national interests tend to shape actors and institutional arrangements for governance of the transboundary commons.
\nThat these institutions signally fail to address the governance challenges tends to be explained in terms of their politico-cultural failings (eg the \u201cASEAN Way\u201d of non-interference), the weak regulatory remit of agencies with a specific transboundary governance role (Mekong River Commission), the dominant developmental agenda of sub-regional cooperative arrangements (Greater Mekong Subregion) or the geo-political dominance of China (Lancang-Mekong Cooperation). This presentation builds on these critiques in two main ways. First, it suggests other ways of thinking about \u201cborders\u201d than fixed political boundaries and about flows across them, including investment and governance flows as well as the material environmental footprint of large scale investments.
\nSecond, it considers the relationship between the local commons impacted by transboundary projects, on the one hand, and the framing of the commons at an inter-governmental level on the other. <\/p>\n

Philip Hirsch<\/strong> is Emeritus Professor, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney and Affiliated Researcher, Regional Centre for Social Sciences and Sustainable Development, Chiang Mai University<\/p>\n

Chair<\/strong>: Yasuyuki Kono, CSEAS<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Transboundary environmental governance of the Mekong: rethinking borders and rescaling the commons by Philip Hirsch Date: April 25, 2019, Thursday 13:30 to 14:30 Venue: Middle-sized Meeting Room, Inamori Foundation Building Abstract: Transboundary environmental governance in Southeast Asia is normally conceived in terms of shared resources and environmental impacts that transcend national borders. In the case of the Mekong, \u201cfugitive resources\u201d of water, fish and sediment tend to dominate discussion. Similarly, assumed national interests tend to shape actors and institutional arrangements for governance of the transboundary commons. That these institutions signally fail to address the governance challenges tends to be explained in terms of their politico-cultural failings (eg the \u201cASEAN Way\u201d […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":5613,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/20190425Colloquium.jpg","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/s8zquF-20190425","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5611"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5611"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5611\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5623,"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5611\/revisions\/5623"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5613"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021-en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}