{"id":2497,"date":"2017-10-03T17:03:23","date_gmt":"2017-10-03T08:03:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021\/?p=2497"},"modified":"2017-11-16T16:55:08","modified_gmt":"2017-11-16T07:55:08","slug":"20171114","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021\/2017\/10\/20171114\/","title":{"rendered":"Special Seminar: Frontiers of Gender Studies in Asia"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Date and time<\/strong>: 14:00-16:00, 14 November (Tue.) 2017
\nVenue<\/strong>: Room 213, the 2nd floor, Inamori Foundation Memorial Building, CSEAS, KyotoUniversity<\/p>\n

Talk 1<\/u>
\nTitle<\/strong>: Research on Women\u2019s Leadership in Indonesia: Women as the Source of Knowledge, New Narratives, and Existing Limitations (2005-2017)
\nSpeaker<\/strong>: Dr. Kurniawati Hastuti Dewi (Senior Researcher,\u00a0Research Center for Politics,\u00a0Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Indonesia)<\/p>\n

Abstract<\/strong>:
\nOver the last twelve years (2005-2017) I have devoted my time, energy, and material to investigating women\u2019s leadership, one of the strategic gender issues in Indonesia. Driven by curiosity to check the validity of the common understandings that believed Muslim countries usually discriminate women, I start to observe women\u2019s leadership in Indonesian Islam. Beginning with the discourse and practice of women\u2019s leadership in Muhammadiyah Islamic modernism movement, and later on Nahdlatul Ulama Islamic traditionalist movement, I have expanded my research to Muslim women political leaders as heads of local government from 2008 until now. Through years of research, their thoughts, experiences, and political story become genuine sources of knowledge that enable us to uncover the bigger picture of the correlation between Islam, gender, networks, piety, sexuality in public sphere as well as social class. They produce a new narrative of Muslim women\u2019s roles in public sphere, as women who are able to take initiative and shape the growth of Indonesian democratization which had been previously dominated by men. They also raise new understandings of veiling that are different from the western feminists\u2019 understanding. Nevertheless, there are cases of women leaders who end their term badly due to corruption cases. From the perspective of a female researcher committed to promoting gender and women\u2019s studies, the fact weakens my efforts at promoting gender awareness. There is so much to do to shorten the gap between normative expectations and the practical situation of women\u2019s leadership in Indonesia. <\/p>\n

Talk 2<\/u>
\nTitle<\/strong>: Gender in Southeast Asia: Fluid, Contested and Negotiable
\nSpeaker<\/strong>: Dr. Shanthi Thambiah (Associate Professor,\u00a0Gender Studies, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences,\u00a0University of Malaya, Malaysia)<\/p>\n

Abstract<\/strong>:
\nIn the literature on gender, there has been a tendency to view the countries of Southeast Asia as less patriarchal than other parts of Asia. Feminist anthropologists working in Southeast Asia unravelled the intricacies of gender in cultures that downplay it (Atkinson 1982; 1990) where gender inequalities were subdued and women were seen to enjoy personal independence. Despite the frequent appeal for regional characteristics and attributes in the field of Southeast Asia Studies, evidence remains largely country-focused and comparative work is rare. It is important to understand how gender is being constituted within a region.
\nOne of the popular themes in Southeast Asian studies for which a comparative regional approach has been applied is the study of gender. A number of edited volumes of essays on gender in Southeast Asia have appeared (Atkinson & Errington 1990; Locher-Scholten & Niehof 1992; Ong & Peletz 1995; Sears 1996; Sen & Stivens 1998, Stivens 1991; Van Esterick 1996) and these collections cross national borders and historical periods, juxtapose \u201cgreat\u201d and \u201clittle\u201d traditions, and sometimes go beyond the grand regional binaries of upland and lowland, island and mainland Southeast Asia (Steedly, 1999: 437). The key principle in gauging the regional assertions in favor of women\u2019s \u201chigh status\u201d is the degree to which the variance between \u201cSoutheast Asia\u201d and other world areas can be defended and the appropriateness of generalizing across such a diverse area justifiable.
\nThis presentation examines the bilateral organization of kinship in Southeast Asia and women\u2019s active role in social and economic activities in all its complexity in a diverse and changing Southeast Asia. It is the bilateral kinship system that contributes to the consideration of Southeast Asia as a region that has certain shared practices and a region with a wide cultural span, diversity, and hybridity. A Southeast Asian \u201ccultural matrix\u201d that is fluid and dynamic can be related to the bilateral social organization system that allows for flexibility in its gender relations and inclusiveness in its group formation contributing to the flourishing of diversity and hybridity. Kinship in Southeast Asia is associated with a lack of structure and a lack of permanence and therefore the \u201ccultural matrix\u201d of the region emerging from this context is more of shared resemblances rather than fixed or normative in nature. Therefore, gender in this region can be seen to be constructed and constituted from such a context and this is an attribute of the \u201ccultural matrix\u201d of Southeast Asia. This is not to make a claim for a generalized and essential bilateral principle and with it gender equality in the region but rather, to argue that this social organization system that may manifest in myriad forms in the local context contributes to the outcome on how gender is seen in the region as fluid, contested and negotiable. Such diversity of behavior, responses and outcomes were and are being overwritten by homogenizing colonial, state, nationalist and global capitalist ideologies and discourses.<\/p>\n

Commentators<\/strong>:
\nYoko Hayami (Professor, CSEAS)
\nEmi Goto (Associate Professor, Network for Education and Research on Asia & Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, The University of Tokyo)<\/p>\n

Moderator<\/strong>:
\nCaroline Hau (Professor, CSEAS)<\/p>\n

**This seminar is organized by CSEAS Gender Equality Committee in collaboration with CSEAS\/CIRAS joint usage\/research project \u201cGender, Family and Modernity in Post-Socialist Islamic Space: Seeking for Links with Middle East Islamic Area Studies.\u201d<\/p>\n

About speakers<\/strong>:
\nKurniawati Hastuti Dewi<\/strong> is Senior Researcher in the Research Center for Politics, the Indonesian Institute of Sciences, and is also a member of the Asian Association of Women\u2019s Studies (AAWS). She earned her Ph.D. in Area Studies from Kyoto University, and MA in Asian Studies from the Australian National University. Her research interests are in the areas of gender and politics, gender and decentralization, Islam and women leadership, representation of women and ethnic minorities, human rights of women and children. Her publications have appeared in leading academic journals.<\/p>\n

Shanthi Thambiah<\/strong> is currently Deputy Dean of Post Graduate Studies as well as Associate Professor of Gender Studies at the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Malaya. She studied at the University of Malaya for her bachelor\u2019s degree, M.Phil from the University of Cambridge and her PhD in Social Anthropology is from the University of Hull. She has published widely on gender, family and work and changing gender relations in Malaysia.\u00a0<\/p>\n

***For these seminars, we will provide a nursing service in a room near the venue for free. If you are interested in using it, please contact us not later than November 5, 2017. (shitara[AT]cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp)<\/p>\n

Contact: obiya[AT]cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Date and time: 14:00-16:00, 14 November (Tue.) 2017 Venue: Room 213, the 2nd floor, Inamori Foundation Memoria […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/s8zpss-20171114","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2497"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2497"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2497\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2661,"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2497\/revisions\/2661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2497"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2497"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www-archive.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp\/www\/2021\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2497"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}