京都大学東南アジア研究所ナビゲーションをスキップしてコンテンツへ 日本語 | English
サイトマップ | ローカルページ
Center forSoutheast Asian Studies Kyoto University

アーカイブ

過去のセミナー案内:24年度

2012年6月

京都大学生存基盤科学ユニット・東南アジア研究所 京滋フィールドステー ション事業 第47回 実践型地域研究定例研究会
  1. 日 時:平成24年6月29日(金) 17:00 ~ 19:00
  2. 場 所:「もやいネット交流空間」 守山駅前 コスモ守山5番館 守山市勝部1丁目16-27
  3. 発表:
  4. ① 亀岡FS 地域再生モデルの提案 ―「ざいちのち」最終報告書を題材にして― 発表者:河原林洋,豊田知八 他
  5. ②コメント 安藤和雄  「亀岡における9 月15,16,17 日の草の根の農村開発ミ ニ国際会議との関連から」
  6. ③検討内容  
  7. 亀岡FS では,保津川にかかわる京筏組の活動や,保津町 すいたん農園,清滝の活性化など,NPO や自治会に当事 者として関わっているメンバーが,実践型地域研究を展開 してきた。それらをくくることのできるキーワードを探り, それを手がかりに9 月の草の根の農村開発ミニ国際会議の 内容についても意見交換を行う。
  8. ★参加ご希望の方は, 京都大学東南アジア研究所実践型地域研究推進室 担当:安藤和雄(ando@cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp)までご連絡ください。
Colloquium
  1. 日時:平成24年6月28日(木) 16:00-
  2. Place: 京都大学稲盛財団記念館3階中会議室
  3. 講師:Dr. Philippe Peycam, Director of the International Institute for Asian Studies (IIAS), Leiden and Amsterdam, Holland
  4. タイトル:1920s Saigon: the Origins of Public Political Contestation in Vietnam
  5. 要旨:
  6. With his new book "The Birth of Vietnamese Political Journalism: Saigon 1916-30, Columbia University Press", Dr. Philippe Peycam, considers the complex historical environment of the colonial city, Saigon, as a hybrid socio-cultural cradle for new forms of individual and collective consciousness that enabled the birth of an original public culture of peaceful political contestation against established modes of social control sanctioned by the colonial power. In early twentieth century Saigon, this culture found expression in a vibrant public sphere of newspapers. Such an emerging political landscape, the urban-centered la`ng ba'o chi' or "newspaper village" evolved from a response to the policies of the colonial regime toward "natives" into an autonomous public forum touching on all aspects of society including the question of Vietnam's subjugation for which it was for a while the principle force of opposition. In the second half of the decade, Saigon's la`ng ba'o chi' had succeeded in isolating the colonial government and demystifying its rhetoric. It proved, however, less effective in altering the political status quo and found itself doubled by new underground mass-based political initiatives with the countryside as their new field of operation.
Tonan Talk
  1. 日時:平成24年6月21日(木) 12:00~13:30
  2. Place:稲盛財団記念館小会議室Ⅱ(331号室)
  3. 講師:Dr. Richard T. Chu, Associate Professor of History, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
  4. タイトル:New Directions and Areas of Research on the Chinese in the Philippines during the American Colonial Period
  5. 要旨:
  6. My current research involves the examination of hundreds of articles relating to the Chinese in Manila, as published in newspapers from 1900 to the 1920s. My presentation will highlight two main themes found in these articles: “crimes” committed by or against the “Chinos” and “race” questions involved in the debates surrounding Chinese immigration to the Philippines.
  7. This research is part of my next book project which aims to investigate the transnational dimensions of the “Chinaman” question in the Philippines. Some questions this book project seeks to answer are: To what extent did U.S. understanding and experience of its “Chinaman” question in the U.S. influence its policies and images of the Chinese in the Philippines? As a corollary, how did U.S. experience of the Chinese question in the Philippines affect Chinese and other racial discourses in the metropole? Primarily a social history of the Chinese in Manila, this next book project deals with broader questions of identity, gender, race, empire, colonialism, and nationalism in early twentieth-century Philippines.
  8. 発表者プロフィール
  9. Richard T. Chu received his A.B. from Ateneo de Manila University (1986), his M.A. from Stanford University (1994), and his Ph.D. from University of Southern California (2003). His research and publications focus on the history of the Chinese and Chinese mestizos in the Philippines and the different Chinese diasporic communities in the world, centering on issues of ethnicity, gender, and nationalism. His book The Chinese and Chinese Mestizos of Manila: Family, Identity, and Culture 1860s to 1930s (Brill, 2010) examines and analyzes the familial and business practices of Chinese merchant families as they negotiated the attempts of colonial governments to control them. His second book project, tentatively entitled “Building a Nation, Effacing a Race: The Making and Unmaking of Chinese Identities in the Philippines,” looks into the transnational construction and continued negotiation of the Chinese as an ethnic “Other” in the twentieth century. Chu is currently Five College Associate Professor of History at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
  10. モデレーター:カロライン・ハウ(東南アジア研究所准教授)
Special Seminar
  1. 日時:平成24年6月20日(水) 15:30~17:30
  2. 場所:東南亭 (稲盛財団記念館201号室)
  3. 発表者1:Jiwon Suh, CSEAS Visiting Research Fellow
  4. タイトル:Indonesian Norm Entrepreneurs and Models of Justice
  5. 要旨:
  6. In this presentation, I discuss the indispensable role played by Indonesian NGO activists in promoting norms and models related to transitional justice, or the way transitional societies deal with authoritarian legacies, particularly human rights violations. The major models I discuss here are “enforced disappearances” and the Argentine model, international criminal justice and the International Criminal Court (ICC) model, and truth and reconciliation commission or the South African model. Through the close examination of “transitional justice advocacy” based on these models, I show some inherent characteristics of transnational diffusion of ideas: plurality of models, piracy as a mode of diffusion, and the role of domestic norm entrepreneurs as “translators.”
  7. 発表者プロフィール:
  8. Jiwon Suh is a Ph.D. Candidate at Department of Political Science, The Ohio State University. She is now working on her Ph.D. dissertation, titled “Politics of Transitional Justice in Post-New Order Indonesia.” Her research interests include transitional justice, human rights, politics of memory, democratization, and women in politics.
  9. 発表者2:Ehito Kimura
  10. タイトル:Indonesia's Failure of Justice
  11. 要旨:This presentation explores the failure of transitional justice in newly democratic Indonesia. It highlights some of the different and competing discourses and practices of justice and reconciliation after the fall of Suharto. It also explores the ways in which the pursuit of justice became mired in an only partially reformed political system. Attempts at justice at the national and local level were often derailed or coopted despite efforts by international and domestic actors in pushing for justice mechanisms.
  12. 発表者プロフィール:
  13. Ehito Kimura is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Hawai'i at Manoa. He studied at Georgetown University (BA), Yale University (MA), and University of Wisconsin-Madison (PhD). His interests are at the nexus of Southeast Asian Politics and comparative political change.
  14. モデレーター:Jafar Suryomenggolo(東南アジア研究所)
Tonan Talk
  1. 日時:平成24年6月14日(木) 12:00~13:30
  2. 場所:東南亭(稲盛財団記念館201号室)
  3. 発表者:Prof. Ariel Heryanto, CSEAS visiting research fellow
  4. タイトル:Locally-Based Area Studies: Potentials and Challenges
  5. 要旨:Area studies has been predicated on some real and imagined difference and distance (geographical, intellectual, political, linguistic, and cultural) that separate the investigating subjects as well as their sponsoring institutions from the life of those investigated as an object of analysis. What are the implications (material, methodological, theoretical, ethical, or political) of doing a locally-based area studies, as the fundamental difference and distance cease to exist? This talk will consider the potentials and challenges of building a locally-based area studies in Southeast Asia. It argues for the need of more innovative concepts of "area" as well as of "studies" than currently available, at a time marked by major developments in new media and popular cultures in the region.
  6. 発表者プロフィール
  7. Ariel HERYANTO is currently a Visiting Research Scholar at Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University, completing his research project on "Pop Cultures in Indonesia: a New Asian Politics of Pleasure and Identity", while on a study leave from The Australian National University where he is Associate Professor of Indonesian Studies. He is the author of "Can There be Southeast Asians in Southeast Asian Studies?", *Moussons*, 5, 2002: 3-30; *State Terrorism And Political Identity In Indonesia: Fatally Belonging*, London: Routledge (2007); editor of*Popular Culture in Indonesia: Fluid Identities in Post-Authoritarian Politics*, London: Routledge (2008); and co-editor of *Pop Culture Formations Across East Asia*, Seoul: Jimoondang (2010).
  8. モデレーター:カロライン・ハウ(東南アジア研究所准教授)
the second SEA-SH Research Meeting
  1. 日時:平成24年6月12日(火)15:00~
  2. 場所:東南亭(稲盛財団記念館201号室)
  3. 発表者:Keith Barney(東南アジア研究所 特定研究員)
  4. タイトル:‘Green Neoliberalism’ and Other Logics of Order and Authority in Southeast Asia: Perspectives from Forest Governance in Laos and Sarawak, Malaysia
  5. 要旨:The concepts of neoliberalism and neoliberal nature have been used extensively in academic geography to understand the last thirty years of post-Fordist political-economic order, and the emergence of market-based approaches to environmental governance. As applied to nature and the poverty-environment nexus, neoliberalism advocates for a broadly coherent set of market-friendly policy reforms, including privatization, commodification/marketization, state de/re-regulation, the externalization of environmental degradation, as well as the increasing subsumption of nature into the logics and circuits of capital accumulation (e.g. payments for ecosystem services). As Karen Bakker (2010) well argues, neoliberalism is a multifaceted concept and can be understood as a political doctrine, an economic project, a set of regulatory practices and a process of subject formation and governmentalization, which are oriented around the concept of ‘governing through markets.’ To counter simplistic ideas of a spreading homogenous geography of neoliberalism, more nuance has been provided through the associated terms ‘neoliberalisation’ and ‘variegated neoliberalism,’ which are used to indicate the contingent, process-based, and articulated relationships of neoliberal actors, policies and processes with national to local political-economic institutions, discourses, and material ecologies. While some scholars now present neoliberalisation as the dominant mode of political-economic and governmental power in Southeast Asian contexts, this presentation will argue for a far more circumscribed understanding, of the power, but also the real political limits and unexpected outcomes, to neoliberal environment governance in the region. I will seek to examine in more detail how neoliberal reforms find eventual political expression in Southeast Asian forest zones. I highlight the uneven socio-natural and territorial configurations that result when neoliberal-influenced projects and policies meet some of the decidedly ‘illiberal’ actors and logics of forest governmentality in the region. Neoliberalization represents a significant and still-useful concept, but I will argue it is far from a hegemonic, meta-rationality in the forests of Southeast Asia, and its limits need to be clarified for it to retain analytical purchase. Examples will be drawn from the author’s research on forest-land governance in Lao PDR and Sarawak, Malaysia. Reflections will be provided on what this research suggests for the continued salience of a Southeast Asian Area Studies in critical social science research, and for efforts toward a ‘Sustainable Biomass Society’ in Southeast Asia.